1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1082 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 96.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3210 mm |
