1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 810 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Crestline |
Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2940 mm |