1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar XK weights approximately 625 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Abarth | Jaguar |
Model | 2000 | XK |
Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2600 mm |