1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1954 Austin-Healey 100
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin-Healey 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey 100 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1954 Austin-Healey 100 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
Model | 2000 | 100 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2660 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 111.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2290 mm |