1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1954 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1954 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1954 Triumph TR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Triumph TR2 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1954 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Abarth | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | TR2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2250 mm |