1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1955 Austin A 30
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1955 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin A 30 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1955 Austin A 30 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 2000 | A 30 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 802 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 28 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 58 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2030 mm |