1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 860 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
| Make | Abarth | Austin-Healey |
| Model | 2000 | Tickford |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2443 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2600 mm |
