1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 2000 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1957 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1957 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5973 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3210 mm |
