1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 540 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Abarth | Toyota |
| Model | 2000 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2540 mm |
