1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 2000 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3300 mm |
