1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1964 Abarth 2000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Taunus weights approximately 175 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 58.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2530 mm |