1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1965 Aston Martin DB5
To start off, 1965 Aston Martin DB5 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Aston Martin DB5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Aston Martin DB5 (314 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Aston Martin DB5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Aston Martin DB5 weights approximately 860 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1965 Aston Martin DB5 | |
| Make | Abarth | Aston Martin |
| Model | 2000 | DB5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |
