1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 470 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Abarth | Sunbeam |
Model | 2000 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1964 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2190 mm |