1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1967 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1967 Ford Cortina is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1967 Ford Cortina. (52 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Cortina weights approximately 210 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1967 Ford Cortina | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 2000 | Cortina |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 63 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |
