1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1969 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1969 Triumph 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1969 Triumph 1300. (61 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Triumph 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Triumph 1300 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Triumph 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1969 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Abarth | Triumph |
Model | 2000 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2460 mm |