1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1975 Volvo 264
To start off, 1975 Volvo 264 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 264. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 264. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 264 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1975 Volvo 264 | |
| Make | Abarth | Volvo |
| Model | 2000 | 264 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |
