1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1979 Nissan 260 ZX
To start off, 1979 Nissan 260 ZX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Nissan 260 ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1979 Nissan 260 ZX. (124 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1979 Nissan 260 ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Nissan 260 ZX weights approximately 490 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1979 Nissan 260 ZX | |
Make | Abarth | Nissan |
Model | 2000 | 260 ZX |
Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |