1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1980 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1980 Lincoln Continental is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Lincoln Continental. (130 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1980 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1980 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Abarth | Lincoln |
| Model | 2000 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2990 mm |
