1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1981 BMW 725
To start off, 1981 BMW 725 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1981 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1981 BMW 725.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1981 BMW 725 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 2000 | 725 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 71.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2810 mm |
