1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1981 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1981 Renault Rodeo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1981 Renault Rodeo. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Renault Rodeo weights approximately 50 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1981 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Abarth | Renault |
| Model | 2000 | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2410 mm |
