1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Abarth | Caterham |
Model | 2000 | 1700 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2260 mm |