1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1987 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1987 Toyota Cressida is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1987 Toyota Cressida. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1987 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 540 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1987 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Cressida |
Year Released | 1964 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2670 mm |