1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1988 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1988 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. (85 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1988 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1988 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1988 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1964 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |