1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1989 Toyota Celica is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Celica. (159 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Celica weights approximately 743 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Celica |
Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1413 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |