1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1991 Italdesign Nazca
To start off, 1991 Italdesign Nazca is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Italdesign Nazca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Italdesign Nazca (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Italdesign Nazca should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1991 Italdesign Nazca | |
Make | Abarth | Italdesign |
Model | 2000 | Nazca |
Year Released | 1964 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2600 mm |