1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 813 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2580 mm |