1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1996 Acura Integra
To start off, 1996 Acura Integra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Acura Integra weights approximately 500 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 2000 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1996 Acura Integra | |
Make | Abarth | Acura |
Model | 2000 | Integra |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2580 mm |