1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1996 Audi RS2
To start off, 1996 Audi RS2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Audi RS2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Audi RS2 (311 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Audi RS2 weights approximately 925 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Audi RS2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Audi RS2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1996 Audi RS2 | |
| Make | Abarth | Audi |
| Model | 2000 | RS2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2226 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2600 mm |
