1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 655 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
| Make | Abarth | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2000 | SLK |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2410 mm |
