1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1997 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1997 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Wrangler. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 760 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1997 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 1997 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 2000 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |