1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 1998 Ford Cougar
To start off, 1998 Ford Cougar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1998 Ford Cougar. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Cougar weights approximately 749 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 1998 Ford Cougar | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 2000 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2544 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 82.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1419 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2580 mm |
