1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 340 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Puma |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1387 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2450 mm |