1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2000 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2000 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 661 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2000 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Abarth | Lotec |
| Model | 2000 | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1150 mm |
