1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Plymouth Prowler weights approximately 650 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Plymouth Prowler has automatic transmission and 1964 Abarth 2000 has manual transmission. 1964 Abarth 2000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Plymouth Prowler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
| Make | Abarth | Plymouth |
| Model | 2000 | Prowler |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2880 mm |
