1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S60. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 795 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Abarth | Volvo |
Model | 2000 | S60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |