1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RSC (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota RSC weights approximately 726 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | RSC |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1396 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |