1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 645 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | |
Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
Model | 2000 | 156 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2600 mm |