1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 920 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2570 mm |