1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 845 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 2000 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2800 mm |
