1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2002 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2002 Lotus Elise is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 Lotus Elise. (156 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lotus Elise weights approximately 136 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2002 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | 2000 | Elise |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 89.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 806 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2310 mm |