1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 703 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2000 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 75 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1373 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |
