1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1229 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 2000 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1899 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |