1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 182 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 814 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2004 Saturn L | |
Make | Abarth | Saturn |
Model | 2000 | L |
Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 182 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |