1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2005 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2005 Fiat Croma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Abarth 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Croma. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Croma weights approximately 935 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2005 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Abarth | Fiat |
Model | 2000 | Croma |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1909 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |