1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT
To start off, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (389 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2005 Ford FPV BF GT | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 2000 | FPV BF GT |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5407 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 389 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 105.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2840 mm |
