1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 827 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2000 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |