1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 737 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | 2000 | 6 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |