1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1478 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Abarth 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Abarth | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 2148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3270 mm |