1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Abarth 2000 (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Abarth 2000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 643 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000.
Because 1964 Abarth 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Abarth 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Abarth 2000 | 2006 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Abarth | Acura |
| Model | 2000 | CSX |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
