1964 Abarth 2000 vs. 2006 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Abarth 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Abarth 2000 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1964 Abarth 2000. (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1964 Abarth 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 408 kg more than 1964 Abarth 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Abarth 2000 | 2006 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | SSR |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 401 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2950 mm |